DAVE DAVIES, HOST:
That is FRESH AIR. I am Dave Davies, in for Terry Gross. It is President’s Day, and at present, we check out the Trump presidency via the eyes of two Pulitzer Prize-winning reporters from The Washington Publish, Philip Rucker and Carol Leonnig. I spoke with them in January when their new ebook was printed, however our interview was preempted on most stations by particular protection of the impeachment trial within the Senate. Immediately, we’ll air that interview together with an replace on occasions because it was recorded.
Leonnig and Rucker’s ebook is an unsettling account of the primary 2 half of years of the Trump administration. There’s the second the place a raging president berates his senior army leaders, calling them losers, one other the place he seems to not know what occurred at Pearl Harbor and lots of cases of erratic decision-making, pushed by the whims of a president with little persistence for the main points of public coverage. Whereas lots of the occasions within the ebook have been publicly reported as they occurred, the authors carried out greater than 200 contemporary interviews so as to add new particulars and context. Carol Leonnig is a nationwide investigative reporter for The Publish. Philip Rucker is the paper’s White Home bureau chief. The title of their ebook is taken from phrases President Trump has used to explain himself; it is referred to as “A Very Steady Genius.”
Carol Leonnig, Philip Rucker, welcome to FRESH AIR. Let’s speak about among the – what you reveal within the ebook. And I believe one of many issues that is gotten probably the most headlines thus far are particulars on a briefing for the president in July of 2017 within the Pentagon. And among the issues the president stated have been – gotten a variety of consideration. However I need you to start by simply telling us – as a result of I discover this additionally attention-grabbing – who arrange the briefing, why they wished to do it and the way they structured it to get the president and hold the president’s consideration.
PHILIP RUCKER: Yeah. Dave, this assembly was a very essential inflection level for President Trump. It was about six months into the administration. And his protection secretary, Jim Mattis; his secretary of state, Rex Tillerson; Gary Cohn, the highest financial adviser – they have been actually alarmed by the president’s lack of expertise in regards to the world, by his lack of know-how about army deployments and bases throughout the globe and felt like they wanted to mainly faculty him, to tutor him.
So that they organized for this assembly at a sacred house within the Pentagon. It is the tank. That is what they name it. It is a personal room the place selections of battle and peace are decided by the Joint Chiefs of Workers. They introduced the president there. And so they went via a slideshow explaining, you already know, the place our troops are deployed, why we now have the alliances we do, what does NATO do, why do we now have so many troops in South Korea within the Korean Peninsula to fend off the specter of North Korea. And the president acquired irritated by this “Schoolhouse Rock!” vibe within the room, and he ended up barking on the generals within the room and the opposite advisers. He stated, you are a bunch of dopes and infants. These are his phrases. He stated, I would not go to battle with you individuals. And it was a very harrowing second. It was emotional – generals who needed to cowl their eyes as a result of they have been so frightened about this second.
Vice President Pence did not say something, although his son is within the army. Rex Tillerson, the secretary of state, was the one one to face as much as confront the president. And after the assembly ended, he stated that the president was an effing moron. And this was so essential as a result of if that is how he respects – or disrespects, relatively – the army leaders, the connection he has with the individuals, he will be relying on to steer Individuals into battle, that’s alarming for these within the army, in accordance with the individuals we spoke with.
DAVIES: Proper. He stated, I would not go to battle with you individuals – you are losers, proper?
RUCKER: That is proper. And he referred to as the battle in Afghanistan a loser battle.
DAVIES: Take us a bit bit extra contained in the give-and-take right here as a result of the thought was to supply him with some primary info. Give us a way – I imply, earlier than these explosive feedback have been exchanged – form of how the president reacted to this tutorial.
CAROL LEONNIG: So take into account, as Phil described, that these three very senior individuals within the administration are hopeful about guiding a novice president. They’re excited in regards to the alternative to assist educate him. They’ve been pissed off, to be clear, as a result of he would not appear to know, you already know, why it is essential to have these bases that mainly, as Mattis stated quite a few occasions on this assembly, that is what retains us protected, Mr. President.
He would not get pleasure from listening to that there must be bases on the Korean Peninsula. He talks about how they should make some cash, why overseas nations have to pay our army to be the place they’re based mostly to guard the Center East or defend Western Europe. He’s saying, you already know, we have to generate profits off this. And that’s one thing that simply drives so many individuals within the room bonkers to the purpose that Rex Tillerson stands up and says, that is not why individuals placed on a uniform, Mr. President. They’re defending our freedom. It isn’t about making a living. It isn’t about making a buck.
DAVIES: It was outstanding that Tillerson was the one determine within the room who instantly contradicted the president.
LEONNIG: You understand, one factor about that second is – that each Phil and I discovered so chilling – is that many within the room are ready for somebody to say one thing, palpably ready. Mike Pence is sort of a wax determine. He says nothing, and that basically troubles among the individuals within the room. Many are ready for Mattis to say one thing, however his head is form of bowed, and it is virtually like he is simply taking it, taking it on the chin. And when he would not say something, that is when Tillerson says, look – I will must step in. All of them form of come to some type of silent acknowledgement that the – mainly the Pentagon brass cannot communicate again to their commander in chief.
DAVIES: The opposite factor that I discovered attention-grabbing about this anecdote is that when these officers – you already know, Protection Secretary Mattis and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Gary Cohn – have been planning this, they took a variety of care to craft a presentation which they thought would seize and maintain the president’s consideration. What variety – how did they do this?
RUCKER: You understand, that far into the administration, the advisers realized that the president did not take briefings like every other president. He would not learn the intelligence ebook. He would not prefer to take heed to lengthy lectures or explanations about what the intelligence is. He likes to see graphics, movies, charts, greenback indicators, his personal identify. And so what Mattis and Cohn and Tillerson did is that they put collectively a slideshow presentation that might intensify all of these, options, that might have, you already know, a map of the world and many greenback indicators and info and figures and make it far more readable in a approach, simpler for President Trump to grasp and never get distracted or bored by. Early within the administration, I interviewed Mike Pompeo, who was then the CIA director, and he stated, you already know what the president likes? And these are Pompeo’s phrases – killer graphics. And that is the best way they realized to ship intelligence to him.
DAVIES: There’s loads in right here about his relationship with President Putin. I wished to – what insights did you get into how Trump thought he may take care of Putin and the way Putin regarded President Trump?
RUCKER: You understand, it is attention-grabbing. From the very starting – this was proper after the election, throughout the transition interval, when Trump was attempting to workers his cupboard. He was in an interview, a job interview, with considered one of his secretary of state candidates. And he turned to Reince Priebus, who was set to change into the White Home chief of workers, and requested Priebus, you already know, when can I meet Putin? (Laughter) I need to meet Putin. Can I meet him earlier than my inauguration?
And that might have been such a rare breach of protocol, to be assembly with the Russian president earlier than having met with the NATO allies, earlier than being inaugurated, whereas President Obama was nonetheless in workplace. But it surely was indicative of Trump’s burning want to have a relationship, a friendship, a bromance with Vladimir Putin. He noticed Putin and nonetheless sees Putin as a strongman, as somebody who has the management talents and form of muscular machismo that is to be admired. And all through the ebook, there are moments the place Trump is admiring of Putin.
And he really lastly had his first assembly with Putin in Hamburg, Germany, on the sidelines of the Group of 20 summit. And he met for about two hours in personal with Putin, and afterwards, he informed Rex Tillerson, the secretary of state – who, by the best way, has years of negotiating with Putin as the pinnacle of ExxonMobil – Trump informed Tillerson, I’ve acquired this. I perceive Putin. I simply spent two hours with him. I do know extra about him than you do. You needn’t advise me anymore. I acquired it below management.
DAVIES: And he expressed the opinion that, you already know, Putin doesn’t have an agenda of undermining U.S. pursuits, proper? You will be buddies.
LEONNIG: That was positively what the president stated repeatedly to all of his aides. Tillerson, Pompeo, the whole nationwide safety firmament, the intelligence neighborhood was continuously attempting to transient this president in regards to the methods through which Putin tries to use American vulnerabilities and leap into conditions the place he can take some benefit.
The truth is, Rex Tillerson was attempting to high school the president gently, not in a patronizing approach, however gently faculty him about – here is what Putin is doing each morning when he wakes up; he is searching for the place we have got a gap, and he will sprint over there, and we can’t be quick sufficient to make the most of it and cease him. And the president repeatedly rejected this, together with rejecting the intelligence that he was introduced continuously about the truth that Putin had instantly, deliberately interfered within the 2016 election. President Trump stated, yeah, I do not assume he is actually doing that.
DAVIES: You write – that is the 2 of you within the ebook – (Studying) Putin had developed a knack for manipulating Trump, making him consider that the 2 of them may get massive issues completed in the event that they ignored their staffs and labored one-on-one. Nationwide safety aides feared Putin knew tips on how to feed the weird mixture of Trump’s ego and insecurity and tips on how to domesticate conspiracies in his thoughts.
LEONNIG: You understand, there may be this second when Putin says to President Trump, you already know, we may have a fantastic relationship, however the individuals, the little individuals beneath us, they’re in opposition to it. It is not precise quote. I need to watch out in what I say about this, however the paraphrase is, mainly, if we simply – you already know, the little persons are rooting in opposition to us in our authorities. I perceive that. And it completely speaks to Donald Trump’s conspiracy theories in regards to the deep state.
You understand, he believed his intelligence neighborhood, his nationwide safety neighborhood, his State Division, his Justice Division must be working for him and defending his picture and his political, you already know, energy. However he additionally believed that they have been out to get him. And it began, truthfully, with the FBI investigation of his marketing campaign to strive to determine if any of the members of his marketing campaign have been coordinating in any approach or encouraging Russian interference.
DAVIES: Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker are each Pulitzer Prize-winning reporters for The Washington Publish. Their new ebook is “A Very Steady Genius.” We’ll proceed our dialog after a brief break. That is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF THE WEE TRIO’S “LOLA”)
DAVIES: That is FRESH AIR. And we’re talking with Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker. They’re each Pulitzer Prize-winning reporters from The Washington Publish. They’ve a brand new ebook in regards to the Trump administration. It is referred to as “A Very Steady Genius: Donald J. Trump’s Testing Of America.”
One of many issues that is fascinating about studying the ebook is you get an inside look of circumstances through which the White Home is coping with a sophisticated challenge, and there is only a degree of confusion and disorganization that places individuals in some very awkward spots. And some of the outstanding is within the first 12 months, early on, and it offers with immigration the place Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and John Kelly, who was then secretary of homeland safety, are in Mexico to form of – you already know, form of patch up a rocky relationship that is been created by President Trump’s insistence that they may pay for a border wall or face massive tariffs. Issues appear to be going nicely, after which the sudden occurs. You need to simply inform us the story?
LEONNIG: Dave, this can be a second that’s putting for lots of causes, however considered one of them is whereas two very senior Cupboard members are attempting to wash up for Donald Trump, they discover themselves undercut by Donald Trump on reside tv. It is February of 2017, so very early within the administration. Each of them have a variety of expertise and publicity in Latin America and Central America and a variety of relationships in Mexico, particularly John Kelly, who had been answerable for Southern Command. And so they’re down there to fulfill with the president of Mexico, additionally to fulfill with a few of his members of his Cupboard and his authorities, to inform them, look – we aren’t at battle with you. Yeah, there’s this massive struggle in regards to the border, however we need to be companions and allies. We need to help you, and we want your assist, too, as a result of in case you may help us cease the unlawful move of immigration, we will strive that can assist you do this. So that is what they’re engaged on, and it’s totally pleasant.
And whereas they’re on their technique to some of the essential conferences, they’re leaving their lodge in Mexico Metropolis and heading collectively out of the hallway in the direction of their motorcade, Tillerson turns to John Kelly within the hallway and says, you are by no means going to consider what the president simply stated. Up in Washington, the president, who’s gotten now within the behavior of getting reside televised crews movie his Cupboard conferences, is assembly with a gaggle of enterprise leaders, and he is telling them that this example on the border is uncontrolled, and he will cease it, and it is now a army operation, basically leaving individuals with the impression that he is about to ship troops all the way down to the border, which is clearly not true. Kelly hears this from Tillerson and goes into overdrive, instantly begins getting a pen – a pink pen – and remarking all of his feedback that he will make on the press convention that is arising together with his Mexican counterparts as a result of he is aware of he will have to deal with what the president simply stated.
The 2 of them are actually flummoxed and offended, they usually’re cursing. John Kelly hits his brow together with his hand and says a curse phrase. And so they head off. And it’s – it falls to John Kelly to provide a – mainly a speech about how, look – we’re not sending troops to the border. He does it in a really deft approach, although, Dave, which is he would not really, once more, confront his boss on worldwide tv. He says, you already know, you individuals within the press, it’s essential to ensure you get this proper – it is not a army operation. You guys have been confused about this previously. Simply need to reiterate – this isn’t a army operation. There are going to be no troops. He cannot be extra emphatic, however he isn’t pointing the finger on the boss.
DAVIES: You each lined authorities for public officers for a very long time. And, I imply, I do know the requirements that you just impose on yourselves as reporters of presidency and politics and that while you cowl officers, I imply, there are some robust tales, and there are additionally occasions you give individuals credit score for doing the fitting factor or not less than good-faith efforts. And I understand how essential it’s so that you can speak to all sides of a difficulty, to be thorough and truthful and open-minded.
However on the final web page of your ebook you could have this assertion about Trump – (studying) By the autumn of 2019, Trump was performing as if he have been satisfied of his personal invincibility, believing he may wield the huge powers of his workplace in pursuit of his private and political objectives with out accountability. He genuinely believed that his pursuits got here first and that, as president, he was above the regulation.
And I am questioning, what’s it prefer to cowl a public official? After you rendered such a harsh judgment about his health for workplace, is it a distinct expertise?
LEONNIG: I do not assume Phil and I’ve come to a conclusion in regards to the president’s health for workplace. What we now have come to a conclusion about is that so many individuals who served at his shoulder for months and years are very frightened about his health for workplace. Everyone knows, as a degree of reality, that he had no expertise in public service earlier than – nothing to talk of. And that is not completely distinctive for a politician; it is form of uncommon for a president.
We really feel strongly that our position as journalists is to share with you the whole lot that we have realized from the individuals who knew him greatest. We select this title, “A Very Steady Genius,” as a result of it is the president’s personal phrases about himself. Now, we maintain that mirror as much as the president, and we stress take a look at it with the individuals who labored for him, the individuals he confided in, the individuals who noticed him day in and time out in a approach that we did not, and that is actually their judgment.
DAVIES: I additionally wished to ask about using nameless sources. You understand, I lined – I used to be a each day newspaper reporter for 20 years protecting authorities at state and native degree. And I form of had a suggestion that I would definitely use confidential sources for info, and in the event that they confirmed that, you already know, a politician was lazy or incompetent, I might report the data, however that in case you wished to render a judgment about any individual’s character or competence, you form of acquired to have your identify on it for me to make use of that within the newspaper.
And within the ebook, you could have a quote attributed to – I suppose it is a senior-level administration official saying, the man is totally loopy; the story of Trump, a president with the horrible instincts and a senior-level cupboard enjoying whack-a-mole. You may have one other nationwide safety official you quote saying, I’ve served with the person for 2 years; I believe he is a long-term and fast hazard to the nation. Do you could have any qualms about nameless quotes which can be that – you already know, these advert hominem assaults? And is it totally different with this president?
LEONNIG: You understand, Dave, I believe Phil and I’ve a really related rule of thumb to yours about this challenge of judging somebody’s character in an nameless quote. I am going to let you know why I really feel that each of us have been snug with this one, which is that it was illustrative of one thing we heard time and time once more. This concept of the cupboard enjoying whack-a-mole with dangerous concepts that the president made with out good info, with out self-discipline, with no actual course of for assessing the perfect path ahead – if we counted up what number of occasions we heard one thing like that, it will be a big, massive quantity.
And I believe that one of many essential issues in regards to the nameless sources right here that you’ve got to bear in mind is that a few of these individuals didn’t communicate to us in actual time when these occasions have been unfolding for a few causes. They have been, one, afraid of Donald Trump and his potential to retaliate in opposition to them, as he is confirmed very adept at together with his very massive Twitter megaphone. And one more reason was a few of them, of their DNA as nationwide safety or intelligence officers, they do not speak to reporters, they usually do not criticize a sitting president, however after we got here round with a ebook, and we stated that is for historical past, after we stated that is going to be the tome that explains Donald Trump’s presidency, they felt compelled – whereas fearful, they nonetheless felt compelled to attempt to assist us get it proper, get historical past proper, and that is why they got here ahead.
And it took a variety of work, however I believe the product is right here now, and readers could make their very own judgment about whether or not they really feel it rings true. We all know we’re assured in it.
DAVIES: Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker are reporters at The Washington Publish. Their new ebook is “A Very Steady Genius.” After a break, they’re going to speak in regards to the challenges of reporting on the Trump administration and on their private interactions with the president. Additionally, jazz critic Kevin Whitehead critiques a brand new album from American saxophonist Ellery Eskelin and two European collaborators. I am Dave Davies, and that is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF HAROLD LOPEX-NUSSA’S “HIALEAH”)
DAVIES: That is FRESH AIR. I am Dave Davies, in for Terry Gross. For President’s Day, we’re listening to my interview recorded in January with Pulitzer Prize-winning Washington Publish stories Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker about their new ebook on the Trump presidency. That interview was preempted on most stations by the particular protection of the impeachment trial within the Senate. Rucker and Leonnig’s ebook relies on greater than 200 interviews with administration officers, Trump confidants and different firsthand witnesses to key occasions. It is referred to as “A Very Steady Genius.”
That is an administration that does not have a really lively press workplace by way of disseminating info. Are there extra leakers than in below different administration? Does extra info come out the perimeters?
RUCKER: Sure, however I would not name them leakers. I might say there are extra individuals contained in the administration – and never simply within the West Wing, by the best way, amongst political aides, however all through the administration, on the Pentagon, within the nationwide safety equipment, on the State Division and elsewhere, on the Justice Division – who’re extra keen, I believe, now to speak to reporters partially as a result of they’re so alarmed by what they see occurring, not solely by the president however by others within the administration.
There’s dysfunction so usually round insurance policies, across the agenda, round motion objects, and I believe there – that has created extra truth-tellers within the administration. It has meant, for us as reporters, that we now have extra sources we will go to, nevertheless it’s additionally meant we now have extra of a problem to type of discover the reality. Once we hear one thing, it is not all the time proper, and we have got to, you already know, speak to a spread of individuals, a spread of sources with totally different views to actually perceive what actually occurred and perceive the actual fact.
LEONNIG: That is proper. And, you already know, I might add one factor, which is that on this den of dysfunction, the president has actually inspired, you already know, rival gangs to go up in opposition to one another, as evidenced by the fights he type of cheers on. And a few of these persons are attempting to dime the opposite ones out, and we have got to ferret via that, as Phil described. We have to be very cautious that we’re not getting pushed and manipulated by their totally different agendas.
DAVIES: The president is thought for frequent misstatements of reality. Not each misstatement of reality is a lie, proper? Generally you will be mistaken. How do you employ your judgment in tips on how to characterize these items?
RUCKER: You understand, we comply with the recommendation of our govt editor, Marty Baron, who seems like, to name a press release of the president’s a lie is an enormous hurdle. To name one thing a lie, we now have to know what the president’s intent was. Did he intend to mislead and misinform and, in impact, lie? You understand, so lots of the issues that he says, we’re extra snug calling them misstatements or falsehoods as a result of we do not essentially know that he is aware of that they are false. We do not essentially know what’s in his thoughts.
You understand, when he was on his birtherism campaign about President Obama and insisting that he was born in Kenya or not less than not born in Hawaii, that was clearly a lie. There was a transparent political motivation there. He had been clearly confirmed incorrect by the info, by the precise delivery certificates. That was a lie. However a variety of the statements that the president makes that aren’t true, we do not apply that label to it as a result of we simply cannot discern what his motivation is.
DAVIES: What have your private interactions with the president been like?
RUCKER: I began protecting Donald Trump’s marketing campaign very early on and interviewed him quite a few occasions at Trump Tower and over the course of that marketing campaign after which a number of occasions within the White Home.
And, you already know, he really referred to as me on the telephone on a Saturday morning as – early on on this mission, when Carol and I began engaged on it. And I took the chance to elucidate to him the ebook and what we’re doing, and, you already know, he was supportive. He stated, I desire a correct ebook performed. I – you already know, you are a severe particular person. It is best to are available. I am going to do an interview. I am going to do it. And sadly, the connection devolved, you already know, within the months that adopted as a result of he was – had such hostility with the information media and with The Washington Publish particularly.
However I’ve all the time present in my interactions with him, together with on Air Power One, when he’ll typically come again to the cabin to chitchat, that he is all the time searching for our approval – and never simply me, in fact, however the different reporters within the press corps. He desires to impress us. He desires to have an effect on our pondering, change the best way we view him and his administration and his insurance policies.
I used to be with him in London in December for the NATO summit. And I do not know in case your listeners will keep in mind, however he had a day the place he had three back-to-back overseas chief conferences. And usually, there are picture ops there, the place you simply are available for about two or three minutes and get an image of the president together with his overseas counterpart, and then you definately depart. And in every occasion, he talked to us for 30 minutes, 45 minutes, taking query after query after query. And he would repeatedly, like, have a look at me and say, do you could have any extra? Do you could have any extra? Give me one other one. He appeared to get pleasure from it.
And so, you already know, he tweets what he tweets, in fact, however deep down and while you’re in a bit bit extra of a personal setting, he very a lot craves our approval.
DAVIES: Yeah, I’ve usually puzzled if reporters who’ve private experiences with the president, when they’re in rallies and the president is, you already know, berating the faux information media, that you just want a few of these listening to this and cheering may really see him interacting with reporters at a private degree. It is actually a distinct angle.
RUCKER: It is very totally different. And, you already know, that is true earlier than he grew to become president, nevertheless it’s very true now – he views the media and particularly the mainstream media as his oxygen. He desires to be on the entrance web page. He desires to be taken critically, like a reputable determine. He brags privately about what number of front-page tales he is on in The New York Instances, which is in fact his hometown paper. Now we are the hometown paper, The Washington Publish. But it surely’s a really totally different mindset than the one which he initiatives publicly to his supporters.
DAVIES: You understand, I am positive while you started this mission, you had no concept that it will be printed simply as a trial could be starting within the Senate for the president’s impeachment.
RUCKER: No approach.
DAVIES: How has that affected the impression, the reception of the ebook?
LEONNIG: In a bizarre approach, Dave, the – all of the reporting that we did and all the brand new issues we came upon, the themes of what this – what motivates this president, how he runs his store, all of them foreshadowed this second, in a approach. I am not saying they foreshadowed obstruction or they foreshadowed abuse of workplace; what they foreshadowed was a theme all through the presidency – Donald Trump is interested by perpetuating his personal energy. It is a presidency of 1, and it is escalating within the route of lack of self-discipline and chaos – a den of dysfunction, as Phil Rucker put it as soon as in a narrative.
And right here we’re at this second. Why is the president in a lot sizzling water? As a result of the guardrails are gone. He was counting on Rudy Giuliani, who informed him, hey, we will get some dust in your No. 1 political opponent, Joe Biden, in Ukraine. And the president requested the Ukraine president for a favor on a phone name, and the favor was for the perpetuation of his personal energy. And that was to assist him in his reelection and get some dust on his then-No. 1 foe.
DAVIES: Philip Rucker, Carol Leonnig – thanks a lot for talking with us.
RUCKER: Thanks, Dave.
LEONNIG: Thanks, Dave.
DAVIES: Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker’s ebook in regards to the Trump presidency is named “A Very Steady Genius.” I spoke to them in January, however the interview was preempted on most stations by particular protection of the impeachment trial within the Senate. Developing, we’ll get an replace from Philip Rucker on occasions since that interview was recorded. That is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF INCREDIBLE BONGO BAND’S “APACHE”)
DAVIES: That is FRESH AIR. We have been listening to my interview recorded in January with Washington Publish reporters Philip Rucker and Carol Leonnig about their ebook, “A Very Steady Genius,” an account of the primary 2 half of years of the Trump administration. For at present’s present, we wished to get an replace on occasions which have transpired since that first interview, and Philip Rucker was accessible for a dialog, which we recorded final Wednesday.
Because the ebook was printed, the president was acquitted within the Senate, and he had a information convention through which he reveled in what he noticed as his exoneration. Does the administration really feel totally different now, totally different post-impeachment?
RUCKER: You understand, it feels barely totally different. The president actually is performing as if he is extra empowered, extra emboldened to do as he pleases with out consequence. And he has cause for that as a result of the proof piled up relating to his conduct with Ukraine, even a few of his Republican allies within the Senate acknowledged that what he did in Ukraine was improper and incorrect, and but he prevented penalty; he prevented punishment. He was, in fact, impeached by the Home, however he was not faraway from workplace and certainly stays president and can struggle on for a second time period in a November election.
DAVIES: You wrote a chunk for The Washington Publish lately, consulting historians and authorized consultants about how the president’s acquittal may have an effect on future presidents and the steadiness of energy among the many branches of presidency. What did you discover?
RUCKER: You understand, I discovered that the Senate’s acquittal within the face of proof that many senators seen as conclusive relating to the president’s misconduct in Ukraine set a sample for the long run and reshaped presidential energy, set a brand new precedent for presidential energy. And historians have been very involved about this as a result of the founders of our authorities arrange a system whereby the legislative department would function a examine on the ability of the manager and that if a president overstepped that energy or did one thing improper or incorrect, there was a system in place whereby the individuals’s representatives, these members of Congress, would have the ability to to examine that.
And Congress, on this case – you already know, the Senate determined to not train that energy and as a substitute made themselves devices of the manager’s energy. They helped allow Trump. They helped defend Trump. And so they despatched a sign that if Trump have been to do that once more, if he have been to once more ask a overseas authorities to assist him with a political errand or if he have been to once more do one thing else that plainly violates a norm on this nation, that there would not be penalties and that they’d have his again as a result of he is the president and he is the chief of their political social gathering.
DAVIES: We have additionally had the occasions surrounding Roger Stone, who’s up for sentencing in federal courtroom.
RUCKER: This has been a watershed second post-impeachment. Critics say that it’s fully improper politicization of the Justice Division and the president attempting to affect the felony prosecution of a pal, to guard considered one of his buddies. The federal prosecutors within the case really useful sentencing of, you already know, a number of years; as much as 9 years was their suggestion. The president believed that was far too strenuous for Stone and really took to Twitter to lash out about that, to talk out that he thought that that sentence suggestion was unfair.
The subsequent morning, we uncover that the Justice Division has overruled the advice of these prosecutors, was revising it. And 4 of these prosecutors then resigned from that case in an obvious act of protest in opposition to the interference by, you already know, political superiors on the Justice Division. The president maintains that he did nothing incorrect right here, that he didn’t personally ask the Justice Division or the lawyer common to revise the sentencing suggestion. Nevertheless, he made his views very clear on Twitter.
There nonetheless extra to study this case, nevertheless it stands for instance of simply how emboldened and free this president now feels, having survived impeachment, to have the ability to run the federal government and pull the levers of energy, together with within the Justice Division, as he sees match.
DAVIES: As you could have talked to sources within the authorities, are they stunned by the occasions we have seen – the elimination of Vindman and his brother, the strikes within the sentencing of Roger Stone?
RUCKER: You understand, individuals I’ve talked to within the authorities and likewise individuals who’ve served within the authorities however are not there proper now are horrified by what they’ve seen. They assume that is clearly incorrect and worry for what the ramifications may very well be for our democracy. However they aren’t stunned in any respect as a result of these actions match the sample of habits from this president during the last three years. And, you already know, we present this within the ebook – how, you already know, each time he avoids accountability and escapes consequence for his actions, he turns into extra emboldened and lashes out additional and pushes the boundaries much more. And the query actually turns into, what’s the breaking level? That is what individuals in our authorities and in our Justice Division particularly are asking at this hour.
DAVIES: What does that imply, the breaking level?
RUCKER: Effectively, at what level has the president crossed the road? At what level does any individual want to face up and attempt to cease him? There was an expectation, actually amongst some, that the episode with Ukraine was that breaking level and that sufficient members of the Senate would stand as much as the president and convict him. That clearly was not the case. However, you already know, there – we may proceed to see an additional erosion of those norms and of our rule of regulation. And the query actually is, when will individuals do something about it?
DAVIES: Is there any proof that Republican senators who voted to acquit the president are bothered by these occasions?
RUCKER: They are saying they’re bothered. A lot of them have stated they’re very involved by these occasions. You understand, Ron Johnson, the senator from Wisconsin, Susan Collins, senator from Maine – each stated that they positioned calls to the White Home to attempt to stop him, stop the president from firing Ambassador Sondland earlier than he took that motion. These calls clearly fell on deaf ears. After which, you already know, extra lately, we have heard from quite a lot of senators, together with Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, expressing actual concern with the president’s obvious intervention within the choice by the Justice Division to decrease the sentencing suggestion for Roger Stone, his pal. She has expressed some concern and misery over that, as have a few of her colleagues.
But it surely’s unclear at this level whether or not concern and misery and senators being disturbed by the actions actually quantities to something if they are not keen to vote or take motion to carry the president accountable.
DAVIES: You understand, Mitch McConnell has stated that the whole – the entire impeachment effort on the a part of the Democrats was a fantastic political blunder. The president appears emboldened, and there is some proof that his, you already know, rankings could have taken an uptick. Do you assume he is in a stronger place for reelection because of the impeachment episode?
RUCKER: Effectively, a variety of senior Democratic officers that I’ve spoken to within the days following the impeachment acquittal do consider that President Trump is in his strongest place so far for reelection. And so they have a look at quite a lot of components. To begin with, he is nonetheless in workplace. So by definition, he’s up for reelection. However he is amassing an enormous battle chest. He’s galvanizing his supporters. His rallies are huge. And he – his approval score, by some measures, has ticked up barely. He stays a traditionally unpopular president. He stays eminently beatable due to how polarizing and divisive he has been, particularly with ladies voters, particularly with voters of coloration.
Nevertheless, Democrats are involved that he will be far more troublesome to beat than they might have bargained for a number of months in the past and are actually frightened. And that is one of many the reason why you see virtually a paralysis proper now on the a part of Democratic voters. They don’t seem to be positive who the perfect candidate is to be their nominee to tackle Trump. You may have so many divisions proper now within the Democratic Get together about whether or not it is Bernie Sanders, whether or not it is Biden, whether or not it is Buttigieg, whether or not it is Mike Bloomberg, the previous New York mayor. And that simply speaks to the stakes of this election and the uncertainty amongst Democrats about tips on how to defeat Trump.
DAVIES: Going ahead, are there tales you significantly need to pursue within the coming weeks and months?
RUCKER: Oh, my gosh. The place can we even start? (Laughter) There’s loads to pursue. I – you already know, I need to resolve what occurred with the Justice Division and Roger Stone – I believe there’s much more to be realized there – and to comply with this marketing campaign and the place it goes.
However, you already know, what I actually need to perceive is how the president goes to make use of his energy within the months forward. He has been impeached. That may all the time keep on with him. However he was acquitted, and his takeaway from that acquittal was to not have change into humbled and realized a lesson, as a few of his Republican Senate allies urged, however relatively to really feel invincible and to behave as if he is above the regulation. And the way does that present itself? How will he train energy within the ultimate 12 months of his first time period? And can that, in flip, win him a second time period? It’d. And there is a variety of worry amongst Democrats that it’ll. And I believe that is a dominant story that we’ll be following right here at The Washington Publish.
DAVIES: Effectively, Philip Rucker, thanks a lot for talking with us once more.
DAVIES: Philip Rucker is The Washington Publish’s White Home bureau chief. His ebook with Carol Leonnig, a nationwide investigative reporter for the paper, is named “A Very Steady Genius.” Developing, jazz critic Kevin Whitehead critiques a brand new album from American saxophonist Ellery Eskelin and two European collaborators. That is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARY BARROSO’S “BRAZIL”)
Copyright © 2020 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced utilizing a proprietary transcription course of developed with NPR. This textual content is probably not in its ultimate kind and could also be up to date or revised sooner or later. Accuracy and availability could fluctuate. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.