SUSAN DAVIS, HOST:
Hey there. Earlier than we begin the present, I must ask a favor. It is a robust time for lots of people proper now. And NPR is right here each day with the information, everytime you’re prepared to listen to it. In reality, some stations have even canceled their fundraising drives to ensure you can get the newest information you’ll want to preserve protected and knowledgeable. However these fundraising drives are the principle supply of cash for a lot of stations. And I hoped that our listeners may be capable to assist them fill the hole. Serving to native stations helps us make the NPR POLITICS PODCAST. So when you’re in a position, please head to donate.npr.org/politics to provide what you’ll be able to. Thanks.
DAN SITES: Hello. That is Dr. Dan Websites (ph). I am an emergency doctor on the entrance traces of the COVID-19 pandemic right here in stunning Indianapolis. I am right here to remind you to remain dwelling for us as we go to be just right for you. This podcast was recorded at…
DAVIS: 2:11 p.m. on Tuesday, March 31.
SITES: Issues might have modified by the point you hear it, however I hope the one factor you’ve got modified is transferring from the kitchen desk to the sofa. Here is the present.
(SOUNDBITE OF THE BIGTOP ORCHESTRA’S “TEETER BOARD: FOLIES BERGERE (MARCH AND TWO-STEP)”)
TAMARA KEITH, BYLINE: I’ve moved from the kitchen desk to the house workplace.
DAVIS: That’s the most cheerful ER physician. He sounded so pleased to be on the entrance traces of a pandemic. I actually like his constructive perspective. It makes me really feel a bit of bit brighter.
KEITH: Yeah, and we’re all staying dwelling for him and for all of us. I promise you I’m on my sofa.
SARAH MCCAMMON, BYLINE: I am in my closet.
KEITH: That is – that counts. That counts.
DAVIS: Hey there. It is the NPR POLITICS PODCAST. I am Susan Davis. I cowl Congress.
KEITH: And I am Tamara Keith. I cowl the White Home.
DAVIS: And the coronavirus outbreak has put a pause in lots of states on elective medical procedures. And in lots of locations, which means abortion, too. Our previous good friend Sarah McCammon has been following that for NPR, and he or she joins us now.
MCCCAMMON: Hello. Good to speak to you.
DAVIS: It is nice to have you ever again within the podcast household.
MCCCAMMON: Yeah. Since we’re all so lonely and much aside, it is at all times good to verify again in, even when it is to speak about information.
DAVIS: Properly, we’re – you are on right now as a result of we wish to discuss one thing I wasn’t really anticipating speaking about in the midst of a coronavirus pandemic, which is abortion rights, which is a matter that has out of the blue and just lately creeped into this debate. What is going on on?
MCCCAMMON: Yeah. I’ve to say, you understand, I requested round originally of the pandemic as a result of that is my beat. And I, you understand, was type of speaking to consultants and stated, is there any impact on reproductive well being care, reproductive rights? And I did not hear lots immediately. However then – and I used to be pondering, you understand, possibly we would not as a result of all the main focus is on this coronavirus. However as one knowledgeable I talked to this week stated to me, abortion is such a political subject, folks will discover a option to struggle about it at any second, even throughout a pandemic.
And what we’re seeing is principally quite a lot of pink states – quite a lot of states led by Republican officers – saying abortion needs to be thought of an elective process, a nonessential process. And these orders that we have seen in a lot of states to droop elective procedures they are saying ought to apply to abortion. After all, you are seeing reproductive rights teams pushing again in opposition to that.
DAVIS: I assume the large query, then, is, what’s an elective process?
MCCCAMMON: Proper. And you understand, totally different states – many of the states, when you learn via the manager orders, have outlined them. Typically, the precept is issues which you can postpone with out adversely affecting the affected person – so circumstances that will not get considerably worse when you wait. However in fact, the query is, is an abortion an elective process? Properly, reproductive rights advocates and reproductive well being teams, just like the American Faculty of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, would say, no, it is not an elective process. If a girl desires to have an abortion, must have an abortion, you’ll be able to’t actually look forward to that due to the character of being pregnant.
DAVIS: Properly, that goes type of to the abortion rights argument that abortion is well being care, that when you’re denying them these companies, then you definately’re denying folks fundamental well being care rights.
MCCCAMMON: Yeah, and that is one thing that – you understand, this isn’t a brand new argument, principally, that because the abortion subject is debated, you understand, within the Supreme Courtroom and in legislatures, typically, you see related debates about whether or not or not abortion needs to be thought of well being care. And that is an enormous message from abortion rights teams – is, look; girls will at all times – they’ve at all times wanted abortions at instances. They’ll at all times search abortions. They’ll discover methods to get them, whether or not it is authorized or not. And naturally, abortion rights opponents would say, you understand, they do not take into account this a well being care process. They take into account it morally flawed, and they also put it in a unique class.
DAVIS: Proper. So have any states successfully halted abortion procedures?
MCCCAMMON: Properly, yesterday, a gaggle of reproductive rights organizations talked to reporters about this. And what we had been informed is that in some states, together with Texas – that tons of of sufferers really had been turned away. So Helene Krasnoff of Deliberate Parenthood says that like all different well being care suppliers, abortion suppliers are doing their greatest to guard their sufferers and cut back pointless use of protecting tools. However she says that Republican officers in a few of these pink states are benefiting from the scenario.
HELENE KRASNOFF: What we’re seeing now could be politicians step in and utterly ban entry, leading to leaving girls with the one choices of touring out of state, making an attempt to self-manage an abortion or being compelled to hold to time period as a result of, you understand, being pregnant does not cease throughout a pandemic.
MCCCAMMON: Now, I ought to say that in a number of states now – as of this taping, three states to this point – Texas, Ohio and Alabama – federal judges have weighed in and stated these orders cannot be utilized to abortion. Abortion needs to be allowed to proceed. And there are some authorized challenges underway in different states, together with Iowa. So that is an unfolding scenario. However what advocates inform me is that there are sufferers who have not been in a position to get procedures they’re in search of.
DAVIS: It is so difficult, although, as a result of if – I imply, I am taking a look at information out of locations like New York Metropolis. And the concept that your medical doctors are principally saying, if you do not have to enter a medical clinic, if you do not have to go to a hospital or another well being care supplier, do not. Do not do it.
And so it does look like that simply actuality of the second has allowed – has given type of the abortion debate, which is at all times type of political and really heated, a second to type of halt it as a result of there may be really a public well being motive for folks to not go anyplace close to these hospitals until they assume their life is genuinely in danger.
MCCCAMMON: Proper. And that is type of the argument you are listening to from the anti-abortion facet of this debate. Teams just like the Susan B. Anthony Listing say, look; each different well being care supplier within the nation is chopping again every thing they will. And I imply, clearly, these are teams that oppose abortion, in order that they’re wanting to see a suspension or an finish to abortion at any time. So it is vital to say that. However the argument they make is that Deliberate Parenthood and different abortion suppliers ought to simply do the identical factor and cancel these procedures.
KEITH: Sarah, the place do you see this going within the courts?
MCCCAMMON: Properly, as we stated, to this point, three – in three instances, federal judges have weighed in and stated that states cannot do that. They cannot droop abortions throughout the coronavirus pandemic, that – not less than in a single case, the choose stated that violates Roe v. Wade and different Supreme Courtroom precedent.
However I talked to at least one authorized scholar, Mary Ziegler, a legislation professor at Florida State College, who’s inquisitive about how it will have an effect on type of the overarching transfer on the Supreme Courtroom to, quite a lot of authorized consultants assume, prohibit abortion rights. After all, we have got two of President Trump’s nominees on the courtroom now. Lots of people are watching and ready and anticipating that progressively, abortion rights will likely be eroded. However Mary Ziegler stated she thinks this might occur extra shortly, probably if the justices are in a position to invoke an emergency scenario.
MARY ZIEGLER: The Supreme Courtroom – and notably members of this group like John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh, who may be gun-shy about decimating abortion rights shortly – may really feel extra comfy doing that if they will invoke public well being or some type of nationwide disaster as cowl for what they’re selecting to do.
KEITH: Sarah, how doubtless do you assume that actually is?
MCCCAMMON: It is actually laborious to say. And Mary Ziegler stated you’ll be able to by no means predict what the courtroom’s going to do. , there are mechanisms by which the courtroom might weigh in in an emergency scenario, however that is definitely not on their docket anytime quickly. However what we do know is that these instances are transferring via the courts, via the federal courts. And even at the moment of disaster, federal judges are seeing these instances as worthy of weighing in on proper now.
DAVIS: All proper. Let’s take a fast break. And once we get again, we’ll discuss doable section 4 laws to handle the coronavirus pandemic.
And we’re again. And the ink is barely dry on the $2 trillion financial rescue bundle simply signed into legislation. However already, some folks in Washington are speaking about section 4 laws – what wants to return subsequent. And Tam, President Trump has some concepts.
KEITH: He does. So on Friday, like, proper after he signed the laws, he was requested if a section 4 may be needed. And he stated that that is one thing that they’ll should look into as a result of the states are going to wish assist. He says they have been harm very badly.
Then we went just a few days with out listening to something. And right now, he tweeted – and I will do my favourite factor, which is studying presidential tweets – he says, with rates of interest for the US being at zero, that is the time to do our decades-long-awaited infrastructure invoice. It needs to be very massive and daring, $2 trillion and be centered solely on jobs and rebuilding the once-great infrastructure of our nation, exclamation level, section 4.
DAVIS: So we’re again to infrastructure week.
KEITH: Yeah. I imply, like, infrastructure weeks have sometimes been, like, actually difficult information weeks.
DAVIS: What number of infrastructure weeks is that this?
KEITH: We’re in, like, undoubtedly infrastructure month proper now.
KEITH: It is a type of infinity at this level.
DAVIS: I imply, is that this – that is one thing, clearly, that is come up many times as a possible alternative for bipartisan cooperation. Is it proper now?
KEITH: All people likes to spend cash on roads, bridges, airports, infrastructure. All of that stuff’s great things. It means jobs. It means development. The problem that has been crippling Washington for years on this – though there was parts of transportation and infrastructure spending, however clearly nothing alongside the scope of what the president’s suggesting – is that they’ve by no means been in a position to agree methods to pay for it. , Democrats needed to do issues – and a few Republicans – like elevate fuel taxes or simply add to the deficit or elevate taxes on firms – all these type of acquainted coverage concepts.
And the explanation why I am – assume that possibly this might be a extra severe dialog than it has been prior to now is without doubt one of the issues that $2 trillion laws simply taught us is that, one, Washington is actually wanting to spend no matter it takes proper now to get the nation again going. They usually do not actually care concerning the deficit proper now. That is not the principle driver of the difficulty.
And you understand, President Trump is saying this week he desires an infrastructure invoice, and Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi stated the very same factor simply yesterday. She’s already additionally speaking about section 4 laws that she says goes to be needed. And he or she’s describing it not a lot about addressing the emergency however specializing in the restoration, what is going on to be wanted for a comeback. And he or she had a convention name with reporters yesterday.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
NANCY PELOSI: This fourth invoice could be about restoration – emergency, mitigation, restoration. And restoration would come with in it a few of the emergency and mitigation elements. Nevertheless it was additionally – be about the place we go from right here. There are infrastructure wants that our nation had that immediately relate to how we’re continuing with the coronavirus.
KEITH: The facility dynamic in Washington proper now, although, is one the place if Donald Trump and Nancy Pelosi agree on the identical factor, it could actually occur. They’ve accomplished it on section two laws, section three laws. They did it on the USMCA, the rewrite of the commerce legislation. I imply, they’ve – they share virtually nothing politically, however after they do agree, they’re utterly in a position to carry everyone else together with them. So if the president and the speaker are significantly speaking about probably doing one other massive, large piece of laws, you may in all probability drag sufficient Republicans on board, even when they’re not likely that enthusiastic about doing it.
DAVIS: So how quickly are we speaking about? I imply, each the president and Nancy Pelosi are speaking about creating jobs and looking out forward. However in fact, we’re nonetheless in the midst of a disaster – a public well being disaster. Do we’ve got a way of the timetable right here?
KEITH: Properly, they are not on the town, proper?
KEITH: Properly, they’re – one, they are not right here, and so they will not be – Congress will not be again till not less than April 20. I believe that is in all probability a reasonably optimistic deadline, contemplating that the president has already prolonged type of the request for everybody to remain at dwelling via the top of the month. , I do not learn about timeline ‘trigger I believe Republicans, as I stated, are type of reluctant to do something actually shortly. Senate Majority Chief Mitch McConnell was on the Hugh Hewitt radio present and stated he was fairly suspicious of Nancy Pelosi’s concepts. He wasn’t embracing them.
(SOUNDBITE OF RADIO SHOW, “THE HUGH HEWITT SHOW”)
MITCH MCCONNELL: , I believe it’s important to genuinely concentrate on the speaker in a scenario like this. I am reminded of what Rahm Emanuel stated throughout the monetary disaster – by no means let a disaster go to waste. What that meant was seize on the disaster to attempt to obtain unrelated coverage objects that you haven’t been in a position to get below different circumstances.
KEITH: And I simply should say that state budgets are going to be an enormous downside within the subsequent couple of months.
KEITH: They’re – they’ve large bills to – you understand, they’re out shopping for masks and ventilators. They usually’re spending – they’re outlaying large quantities of cash to attempt to take care of this disaster. On the similar time, their tax revenues are simply going to be decimated. And I simply do not understand how states are going to stability these budgets until they get some assist from the federal authorities.
DAVIS: And Sarah, there’s some information out of Texas whereas we have been doing this podcast.
MCCCAMMON: Proper. It appears like that – principally, below one other federal courtroom ruling, it appears just like the Texas lawyer common has efficiently gotten the next courtroom to raise that order, which principally implies that not less than for now, the order stands. Abortions are thought of a nonessential process in Texas and should cease in the intervening time – not less than nonemergency ones. However that would change. All of this may change in a short time.
DAVIS: All proper. That’s it for us for right now. Sarah, thanks a lot for approaching on the podcast. It was nice to have you ever again with us.
MCCCAMMON: My pleasure. Good to speak to you all.
DAVIS: And we’re speaking about doing a listener query podcast later within the week concerning the political and financial impacts of the coronavirus outbreak. So when you’ve got a query you would like us to reply, ship them to us. You may attain us on e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org or ask us on our Fb group. You could find it at n.pr/politicsgroup.
I am Susan Davis. I cowl Congress.
KEITH: And I am Tamara Keith. I cowl the White Home.
DAVIS: And thanks for listening to the NPR POLITICS PODCAST.
(SOUNDBITE OF THE BIGTOP ORCHESTRA’S “TEETER BOARD: FOLIES BERGERE (MARCH AND TWO-STEP)”)
Copyright © 2020 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced utilizing a proprietary transcription course of developed with NPR. This textual content is probably not in its ultimate kind and could also be up to date or revised sooner or later. Accuracy and availability might range. The authoritative document of NPR’s programming is the audio document.